Will our utterly two faced; hypocritical and holier than thou neta's learn a lesson at long last......
Following in the footsteps of the Justice Varma headed committee's report a Delhi trial court lamented and bemoaned the fact that the law as it exists in it's present form abjectly fails to protect married women from all kinds of sexual perversities foisted on them by their legally married husbands and directed the people's representatives to enact such laws that would provide the long suffering married Indian woman with this much desired protection..........
These scathing observations were made by the trial court while contemptuously rejecting the bail plea of a man (husband) accused of forcing his wife into performing unnatural sexual acts on him as well as participating in such unnatural acts in an effort to satiate his deviant carnal desires.........
In the FIR filed by her, the victim (a Delhi based married woman) has also more than convincingly succeeded in establishing the fact that her husband used to coerce her into watching adult sex/porn videos much against her will and then expect her to re-enact all those sexual picadilloes portrayed in the afore mentioned videos with her........
The victim has also succeeded in establishing the fact beyond all reasonable doubt that her sexually engorged husband bit her all over her anatomy (body) after lustfully watching one such video and the teeth marks on various parts of her testimony bear a telling testimony to her husband's utter depravity and debauchery; additional sessions judge Kamini Lau acidly remarked...........
As it stands at the present time; sexual acts forced or otherwise by a man with his wife who is over and above 15 years of age do not constitute rape and hence allow many an errant and utterly demonic husband who feels that his wife is nothing more than an outlet for his outlandish sexual dsires gets away scot free every time as the law as it stands does not recognise the deplorable and detestable acts of marital rape........
"Under the present/prevalent circumstances; women have to be protected from all kinds of sexual pereversity.....and the same cannot simply be condoned as the complainant happens to be the lawfully wedded wife of the accused;l and the same does not in any manner mitigate the offence keeping in view the heinousness and seriousness of the allegations involved"; additional sessions judge Kamini Lau observed while setting aside the husband's bail plea.........
She further added" the acts highlighted or brought forth by the complainant in her petition not only constitute an unnatural act against the course of nature but also bring the alleged acts of the man under the amended purview/definition of rape under section 376 of the IPC ; which unfortunately cannot be invoked in this instance as the accused happens to be the husband of the victim/complainant and hence absolved of the crime of rape as the Indian law as it presently stands patently fails to identify the heinous crime of marital rape despite there being a desirability and long standing demand for the same"...........
In his bail plea; the accused had alluded to the fact that his wife had filed this complaint against him on patently false, utterly fictitious and completely fabricated grounds; but the judge not only set aside his bail plea with the utter contempt it deserved but also gave him an earful in the bargain............
Following in the footsteps of the Justice Varma headed committee's report a Delhi trial court lamented and bemoaned the fact that the law as it exists in it's present form abjectly fails to protect married women from all kinds of sexual perversities foisted on them by their legally married husbands and directed the people's representatives to enact such laws that would provide the long suffering married Indian woman with this much desired protection..........
These scathing observations were made by the trial court while contemptuously rejecting the bail plea of a man (husband) accused of forcing his wife into performing unnatural sexual acts on him as well as participating in such unnatural acts in an effort to satiate his deviant carnal desires.........
In the FIR filed by her, the victim (a Delhi based married woman) has also more than convincingly succeeded in establishing the fact that her husband used to coerce her into watching adult sex/porn videos much against her will and then expect her to re-enact all those sexual picadilloes portrayed in the afore mentioned videos with her........
The victim has also succeeded in establishing the fact beyond all reasonable doubt that her sexually engorged husband bit her all over her anatomy (body) after lustfully watching one such video and the teeth marks on various parts of her testimony bear a telling testimony to her husband's utter depravity and debauchery; additional sessions judge Kamini Lau acidly remarked...........
As it stands at the present time; sexual acts forced or otherwise by a man with his wife who is over and above 15 years of age do not constitute rape and hence allow many an errant and utterly demonic husband who feels that his wife is nothing more than an outlet for his outlandish sexual dsires gets away scot free every time as the law as it stands does not recognise the deplorable and detestable acts of marital rape........
"Under the present/prevalent circumstances; women have to be protected from all kinds of sexual pereversity.....and the same cannot simply be condoned as the complainant happens to be the lawfully wedded wife of the accused;l and the same does not in any manner mitigate the offence keeping in view the heinousness and seriousness of the allegations involved"; additional sessions judge Kamini Lau observed while setting aside the husband's bail plea.........
She further added" the acts highlighted or brought forth by the complainant in her petition not only constitute an unnatural act against the course of nature but also bring the alleged acts of the man under the amended purview/definition of rape under section 376 of the IPC ; which unfortunately cannot be invoked in this instance as the accused happens to be the husband of the victim/complainant and hence absolved of the crime of rape as the Indian law as it presently stands patently fails to identify the heinous crime of marital rape despite there being a desirability and long standing demand for the same"...........
In his bail plea; the accused had alluded to the fact that his wife had filed this complaint against him on patently false, utterly fictitious and completely fabricated grounds; but the judge not only set aside his bail plea with the utter contempt it deserved but also gave him an earful in the bargain............
No comments:
Post a Comment